Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
school:classes:cs352:start [20 years ago - 2006/03/02 23:55] aogailschool:classes:cs352:start [19 years ago - 2007/05/28 06:45] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 947: Line 947:
     * Not all you need.     * Not all you need.
  
-==== Heuristic Evaluation ====+==== HE Overview ====
  
   * Developed by Jacob Nielsen.   * Developed by Jacob Nielsen.
Line 1019: Line 1019:
     * Find different problems.     * Find different problems.
     * Don't waste participants.     * Don't waste participants.
 +
 +==== HE Results ====
 +
 +  * Single evaluator achieves poor results.
 +    * Only finds 35% of usability problems.
 +  * 5 evaluators find ~75% of problems.
 +    * If they work as team, it's back down to 35%.
 +  * Why not more evaluators?
 +    * Adding evaluators costs more.
 +    * Many more evaluators won't find many more problems.
 +
 +===== Evaluation (2) & Wrap-Up =====
 +
 +==== Evaluation Pt. 2 ====
 +
 +=== Usability Testing: The Usability Lab ===
 +
 +  * A specially designed room for conducting controlled experiments observing a task.
 +  * Cameras, logging systems, people track what users do.
 +  * Good lab costs $$$.
 +
 +== Observation Room ==
 +
 +  * Three cameras capture subject, subject's monitor, and composite picture.
 +  * One-way mirror plus angled glass captures light and isolates sound between rooms.
 +  * Room for several observers.
 +  * Digital mixer for mixing of input images and recording to media.
 +
 +== Other Capture - Software ==
 +
 +  * Modify software to log user actions.
 +  * Can give time-stamped keypress/mouse events -- sync with video
 +  * Commercial software available ($$$)
 +  * Two problems:
 +    * Too low level, want higher level events
 +    * Massive amount of data; need analysis tools
 +
 +== Complimentary Methods ==
 +
 +  * Talkaloud protocols
 +  * Pre/post surveys
 +  * Participant screening/normalization
 +  * Compare results to existing benchmarks