Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| school:classes:cs352:start [20 years ago - 2006/03/02 23:55] – aogail | school:classes:cs352:start [19 years ago - 2007/05/28 06:45] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 947: | Line 947: | ||
| * Not all you need. | * Not all you need. | ||
| - | ==== Heuristic Evaluation | + | ==== HE Overview |
| * Developed by Jacob Nielsen. | * Developed by Jacob Nielsen. | ||
| Line 1019: | Line 1019: | ||
| * Find different problems. | * Find different problems. | ||
| * Don't waste participants. | * Don't waste participants. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== HE Results ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Single evaluator achieves poor results. | ||
| + | * Only finds 35% of usability problems. | ||
| + | * 5 evaluators find ~75% of problems. | ||
| + | * If they work as team, it's back down to 35%. | ||
| + | * Why not more evaluators? | ||
| + | * Adding evaluators costs more. | ||
| + | * Many more evaluators won't find many more problems. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Evaluation (2) & Wrap-Up ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Evaluation Pt. 2 ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Usability Testing: The Usability Lab === | ||
| + | |||
| + | * A specially designed room for conducting controlled experiments observing a task. | ||
| + | * Cameras, logging systems, people track what users do. | ||
| + | * Good lab costs $$$. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Observation Room == | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Three cameras capture subject, subject' | ||
| + | * One-way mirror plus angled glass captures light and isolates sound between rooms. | ||
| + | * Room for several observers. | ||
| + | * Digital mixer for mixing of input images and recording to media. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Other Capture - Software == | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Modify software to log user actions. | ||
| + | * Can give time-stamped keypress/ | ||
| + | * Commercial software available ($$$) | ||
| + | * Two problems: | ||
| + | * Too low level, want higher level events | ||
| + | * Massive amount of data; need analysis tools | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Complimentary Methods == | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Talkaloud protocols | ||
| + | * Pre/post surveys | ||
| + | * Participant screening/ | ||
| + | * Compare results to existing benchmarks | ||